Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11752 (UTT)

PANKAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1056/2024 · 2025-03-20

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1056 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Prasanna Karnatak, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. On instructions, learned State Counsel made a statement at bar, that after investigation, the closure report has been submitted. The same are taken on record. As per instructions, the lady, namely, Sonam Sharma who was allegedly found missing, later on found in Kanpur along with her children. She categorically made a statement to the Investigating Officer that she does not want to live with her husband i.e. the petitioner. 4. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of. 5. However, the State is directed to supply the address of Sonam Sharma to the petitioner within a period of ten days from today. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 20.03.2025 AK