Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:36975
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1855 of 2023 Daroga Singh Maravi S/o Shri Sheshman Maravi Aged About 61 Years Presently Posted And Working As Range Officer, Forest Range Marwahi, Forest Division Marwahi, District Gourela Pendra Marwahi Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Forest, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest Aranya Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Conservator Of Forest Bilaspur Circle, Sindhi Colony, Jarhabhatha, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - Divisional Forest Officer Forest Division Marwahi, District Gourela Pendra Marwahi Chhattisgarh 5 - Divisional Forest Officer Forest Division, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Ms. Priyanka Rai, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Abhishek Thakur, Advocate For State : Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 29/07/2025 1 Heard Ms. Priyanka Rai, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Abhishek Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.07.29 19:03:01 +0530
2 2 The petitioner has filed this petition with the following prayers:-
“10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire record pertaining to the present case. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned report dated 01-03-2023 (Annexure P-1) and also impugned order dated 24-02-2023 (Annexure P-3). 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 3 At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she seeks to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition, if exigency so arises. 4 Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdraw with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge
Yogesh