- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3371-DB RFA No. 200006 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ AND THE HON'BLE Mrs JUSTICE K S HEMALEKHA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 200006 OF 2024 (DEC) BETWEEN: SANJAY S/O. CHANDAR PAWAR AGE 45 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O.VILLAGE BALOOR THANDA, TQ: BHALKI, DIST: BIDAR-585 328. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SAGAR RAMACHENDAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. HANMANTH RAO S/O. RAM RAO PANDRE AGE 99 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O.JANAWADA VILLAGE, TQ:& DIST: BIDAR-585402. 2. PRAKASH S/O.HANMANTH RAO PANDRE AGE 57 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE R/O. JANAWADA VILLAGE TQ:& DIST: BIDAR-585 402. Digitally signed by KHAJAAMEEN MALAGHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3371-DB RFA No. 200006 of 2024 3. ANAND RAO S/O.HANMANTH RAO PANDRE AGE 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O.JANAWADA VILLAGE TQ:& DIST: BIDAR-585 402. 4. VILAS RAO S/O.HANMANTH RAO PANDRE AGE 53 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O JANAWADA VILLAGE TQ:& DIST: BIDAR-585 402. 5. RAMRAO S/O.HANMANTH RAO PANDRE AGE 57 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE R/O.JANAWADA VILLAGE TQ:& DIST: BIDAR-585 402. 6. LAXUMAN RAO S/O.HANMANTH RAO PANDRE AGE 57 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O.JANAWADA VILLAGE TQ:& DIST: BIDAR-585 402. …RESPONDENTS THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER XL RULE 1 & 2 OF CPC, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.12.2022 PASSED IN O.S. NO.69/2016 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BHALKI, DIST:BIDAR AND ETC., THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3371-DB RFA No. 200006 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ AND HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K S HEMALEKHA ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K S HEMALEKHA) Matter is listed for seventh time for non-compliance of office objections. More than three occasions this Court finally granted time at the request of the learned counsel for appellant to comply the office objections. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant as well. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, we have no option than to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution. Appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (MOHAMMAD NAWAZ) JUDGE Sd/- (K S HEMALEKHA) JUDGE KJJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4 CT:JLR