HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) 54/2024 in[OWP 1886/2018]. GHULAM MOHAMMAD NAJAR. …Petitioner(s) Through: Ms. Asifa Jan, Advocate. VERSUS VIVEKANANDA RAI. Through: Mr. Hakeem Aman Ali, Dy. AG. …Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE. ORDER 18.11.2025 01. Mr. Hakeem Aman Ali, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing on behalf of the respondent fairly submits that the order/judgment passed by the learned Writ Court has been complied with. 02. However, the interest to the tune of approximately Rs. 1,40,000/- is still payable to the petitioner, which learned counsel for the respondent assures that the same will be paid within a period of two weeks from today. 03. In light of the assurance extended by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping this contempt petition 21 Regular alive. Accordingly, proceedings in the instant contempt petition are closed. Rule, if any, shall stand discharged. 04. In view of the assurance given by the learned counsel for the respondent, the balance amount of approximately Rs. 1,40,000/- which is payable by way of an interest component in terms of the order/judgment passed by this Court dated 20th of October, 2023 shall be released in favour of the petitioner within the aforesaid extended period of two weeks from today. 05. It is further made clear that in case the aforesaid balance amount as assured by the learned counsel for the respondent is not paid to the petitioner within the stipulated period, the petitioner shall be at liberty to revive the instant contempt petition. In such an eventuality, the Court would be constrained to initiate coercive measures against the respondents. 06. Contempt petition disposed of. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE SRINAGAR 18.11.2025 Bisma