AAMIR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO.
BAIL/452/2025 · 2025-09-18
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117473 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117473 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 452 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Praveen Shukla, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Jayant Singh Tomar, the learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.
3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of F.I.R. lodged on 01.11.2024, stating that the applicant had enticed away the informant's daughter aged about 19 years. 4. In the statement recorded under Section 180 B.N.S.S., the victim stated that she was in a relationship with the applicant for the past 6 years and the applicant had enticed her away. She stated that the applicant is already married and has two children and he has allured her that being Muslim he can marry the victim also. 5. The medico legal examination report of the victim reveals no mark of injury or sign of use of force. 6. In the statement recorded under Section 183 B.N.S.S., the victim stated that she knows the applicant for the past six years, she loves him and she wants to marry him. 7. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is a young man aged 23 years having no criminal history and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. 8. Learned AGA-I has opposed the bail application he has submitted that allegations have been established during investigation and a charge-sheet has already been submitted. 9. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ramakar Shukla, Paritosh Shukla, Ravindra Shukla, Sukh Deo Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Aamir .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
view the statements of the victim recorded under Section 183 B.N.S.S., coupled with the fact that the applicant is a young man aged 23 years having no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 03.11.2024 whereas the investigation already stands concluded, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail. 10. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 11.
Let the applicant-Aamir be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to the following conditions: - (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. September 18, 2025 Pradeep/- BAIL No. 452 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench