CONST. 180490051 RAMAKANT TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/618/2025 · 2025-01-21
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117472 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117472 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:3741 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 618 of 2025 Petitioner :- Const. 180490051 Ramakant Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Awadhesh Kumar Shukla,Sanjai Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri Awadhesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that petitioner who is working on the post of Constable in 10th Vahini, PAC, Barabanki had applied for appearing in the U.P. B.Ed. Examination, 2024 and an application was moved to the Commandant, 10th Vahini, P.A.C., Barabani / respondent No. 3 with a request to grant study lease / special leave / leave without pay for a period of one year commencing from 01.09.2024 so that he may be able to complete education.
3. In support of his submissions, he has submitted that there is provisional for grant of two years of study leave as per the relevant rules in this regard.
4. In this regard, it has been submitted that petitioner has given a representation dated 23.08.2024 to the respondent which is pending consideration and has not been decided so far.
5. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case respondent No. 3 is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 23.08.2024 (Annexure No. 4) in a time bound manner.
6. Learned Standing Counsel does not object if a direction is issued to respondent for expeditious disposal of the representation preferred by the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 3 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 23.08.2024 (Annexure No. 4) expeditiously, say, within a period
of four weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced before him in accordance with law. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 21.1.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench