1 2025:CGHC:14915 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1921 of 2025 1 - Savitri Dhurv D/o Shri Pardeshi Ram Dhruv Aged About 42 Years Cast- Gond, Working As Assistant Of Aaganbadi, Center No. 1 Hardikala (Tona), Bilaspur, R/o Ward No. 5, Vallage Hardikala (Tona), Bilaspur (C.G.) . Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - District Education Officer Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - Block Education Officer Block Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Project Officer Women And Child Development Department, Block- Bilha, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Manisha Verma Aaganbadi Woker, Center No. 5 Hardikala (Tona), Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shashi Kumar Kushwaha, Advocate For State : Mr. Ajit Singh, GA (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2025.03.28 14:35:46 +0530 2 27/03/2025 1. By the present Writ Petition, the Petitioner is questioning the appointment order dated 23/12/2024 (Annexure-P/1), whereby Respondent No.6 has been appointed as Aangan Badi Worker. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the State submits that as per clause 11 of the Circular dated 02/04/2008 issued by the Govt. of Chhattisgarh, there is a provision of appeal before the Collector under the Chhattisgarh Raj Panchyayat Adhiniyam, 1993, and the petitioner without availing the alternative remedy has approached before this Court to question the appointment order, therefore, this writ petition is not maintainable. 3. In view of the above submission, this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach before the Collector, Bilaspur by filing an appeal to question the order of appointment of respondent No.6. In case of filing of an appeal by the petitioner, the Collector, without going into the issue of delay, shall decide the same in accordance with law and on its own merit within a stipulated period, preferably as early as possible. 4. With the aforesaid liberty/direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Rahul