Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 117436 (MAD)

K. Rajeshwaran v. The Director General of Police

WP(MD)/1907/2025 · 2025-01-24

M Nirmal Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD)No.1907 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.01.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR W.P.(MD)No.1907 of 2025 K.Rajeshwaran ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Road, Chennai. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Theni District. 3. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch (DCB), Theni District. 4. Selvakumar, 5. Priyanka, ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent no.1 to 3 to take appropriate action against the Respondent no.4 and 5 on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 19.12.2024 in accordance with law 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.1907 of 2025 within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr. R.Manibharathi For Respondents : Mr.A.Thiruvadikumar(R1 to R3) Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed directing the Respondent no.1 to 3 to take appropriate action against the Respondent no.4 and 5 on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 19.12.2024. 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents police. Perused the materials available on record. 3.The contention of the petitioner is that based on the complaint given by the petitioner against the respondents 4 and 5, no action has been taken. The respondents 4 and 5 are the estranged brother-in-law and wife of the petitioner. It is the allegation of the petitioner that the respondents 4 and 5 have created forged appointment order and operated the bank account of the petitioner. Since no action 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.1907 of 2025 has been taken, this petition has been filed. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that since the matter pertains to matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and his wife/5th respondent and the cases filed by the 5th respondent as against the petitioner are pending, the respondent police closed the enquiry in the complaint given by the petitioner. 5.In view of the above, nothing survives for further adjudication. Accordingly, this petition stands closed. 24.01.2025 NCC: Yes/No Index: Yes/No Internet : Yes/No PNM 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.1907 of 2025 To 1. The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Road, Chennai. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Theni District. 3. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch (DCB), Theni District. 4. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.1907 of 2025 M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. PNM ORDER IN W.P.(MD)No.1907 of 2025 24.01.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis