Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 117369 (ALL)

ANIL KUMAR SHARMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COLLECTOR DISTT. SITAPUR AND 2 OTHERS

/444/2025 · 2025-01-24

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4879 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 444 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Sharma And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Collector Distt. Sitapur And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suresh Sharma,Sanjay Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sanjeev Kumar Singh Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer: "(i) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order/notice issued by the opposite party no.3, calling the petitioners to deposit the amount of Rs. 1,05,000/- till 15.11.2024 including further proceeding in pursuant thereto, as contained in Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition. (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties to consider the case of petitioners for providing benefit under the Uttar Pradesh Kisan Karj Mafi Yojna 2017 in respect of the financial assistance granted to the father of petitioners for the purposes of poultry farming." 3. The present petition has been filed challenging a formal notice, whereby, the petitioner has been calling to come and settle the loan amount. It is not a recovery notice, as such, no interference is called for. 4. However, in case the petitioner approached the opposite party no.3 and file an application for getting certain benefits, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Order Date :- 24.1.2025 akverma Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench