CWP-7408-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (116) CWP-7408-2025 Date of Decision : March 18, 2025 Seema .. Petitioner Versus Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Lalit Rishi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Yadav, Advocate, for the respondents. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the impugned order dated 04.03.2025 (Annexure P-7) has been passed without even giving any reason as to why, the possession of the House No.142-A Type-D in HSAMB Staff Colony, Sector 14, Panchkula has been cancelled and the same has been cancelled by a totally cryptic and non-speaking order, which cannot be sustained in the eyes of law. 2. Notice of motion. 3. Mr. Ashish Yadav, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the impugned order dated 04.03.2025 (Annexure P-7) be treated as withdrawn with liberty HARSHA RANI 2025.03.19 14:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-7408-2025 2 to pass a fresh order in accordance with law by giving due reasons as to why the petitioner is not entitled to hold the possession of the house in question. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the impugned order dated 04.03.2025 (Annexure P-7) has been withdrawn, the grievance of the petitioner stand satisfied and the present writ petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further. 6. Ordered accordingly. March 18, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) harsha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No HARSHA RANI 2025.03.19 14:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document