IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 223 LPA-2091-2024 Date of Decision: 11.09.2025 KULWINDER SINGH ...Appellant Versus FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER (APPEAL) PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- None for the appellant. ***** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) 1. The present appeal was taken up for hearing for the first time on 02.09.2024 and notice of motion was issued on the said date. Thereafter, one year has passed but even the process fee has not been deposited to respondent No.4. Today no one has appeared on behalf of the appellant, which fact clearly shows that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the present appeal. 2. Dismissed for non-prosecution. ( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) JUDGE ( VIKAS SURI ) September 11, 2025 JUDGE harish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No HARISH KUMAR 2025.09.11 18:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment