DILEEP KUMAR SHUKLA (IN FIR DILEEP SHUKLA) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/385/2025 · 2025-01-17
Om Prakash Shukla, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117338 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117338 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2955-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 385 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dileep Kumar Shukla (In Fir Dileep Shukla) Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gyanendra Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State/opposite parties and perused the record.
2. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 31.12.2024, bearing F.I.R./Case Crime No.0389 of 2024, for the offence under Sections 323, 504, 506, 406 I.P.C. and Sections 3(1)(Da), 3(1)(Gha) of SC/ST Act, registered at Police Station Shivgarh, District Raebareli.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the offences as alleged in F.I.R. have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas, the police is trying to arrest him, which is against the mandates of Code of Criminal Procedure.
4. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioner, entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 41-A Cr.P.C. (Now Section 35(3) of BNSS, 2023) shall be strictly followed in terms of judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in a case reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273: Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another.
5. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioner states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said
facts.
6. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 41-A Cr.P.C. (Now Section 35(3) of BNSS, 2023) and the law as laid down by Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar (supra). . [Om Prakash Shukla,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.]
Order Date :- 17.1.2025 Sachin Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench