VINOD KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P.THR.PRIN SECY EXICSE AND 2 ORS
WRIA/8939/2006 · 2025-05-14
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117312 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117312 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28220
Court No. - 28 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8939 of 2006 Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thr.Prin Secy Exicse And 2 Ors Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K.Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J.
1. Case called out in revised list.
2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition. However, learned Standing Counsel is present.
3. The matter pertains to the year 2006 and since then it has remained pending. It appears that petitioner has lost his interest to pursue his case. Apart from it, by efflux of time, writ petition has become infructuous.
4. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) Order Date :- 14.5.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench