Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11731 (AP)

K.Peda Peri Reddy v. K.V.Mohana Rao

CRP/703/2022 · 2025-07-10

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010136482022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA AT AMARAVATI PRADESH FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY JULY FIVE PRESENT the honourable SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL revision PETITION Kin- 703 OF 2099 Petition under Article 227 of the docket order dated 29.12.2021 | 2014 on the file of the VII Additional Constitution of India, aggrieved by the passed in lA. No. 79/2021 in OS.No. 22 of -1 District Judge at Visakhapatnam. Between: K-Peda Peri Reddy, S/o, K.V.Reddy, aged about 62 years, Occ: Retired em er of Stale Human Rights commission, R/o. Bungalow No.4 fficers Quarters, Kundanbagh, Begumpet, Hyderabad ...PETITIONER AND KV^Mohana Rao, S/o. late Gopala Rao, aged 70 years, r/o D.No. 49-35-9, Vtdyutnagar, Near Port Stadium, Visakhapatnam ...RESPONDENT lA NO: 1 OF 7099 in th “^oumstances stated the aff,dav,t filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in OS. No. 22 of 2014 on the file of the VII Additional District Judge at Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the Civil Revision Petition. 4 , Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI V.HEMANTH KUMAR, ADVOCATE Counsel for the Respondent: SRI V.V. RAVI PRASAD, ADVOCATE The Court made the following ORDER : APHC010136482022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3505] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 703/2022 Between; 1.K.PEDA PERI REDDY, S/0 K.V.REDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC- RETIRED MEMBER OF STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, R/ O BUNGALOW N0.4, OFFICERS QUARTERS, KUNDANBAGH, BEGUMPET, HYDERABAD ...PETITIONER AND 1.K V MOHANA RAO, s/o late Gopala Rao, aged 70 years, r/o D.No. 49-35-9, Vidyutnagar, Near Port stadium, Visakhapatnam ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to- i)allow the C.R.P. by setting aside the docket order dt.29-12- 2021 passed in LA.No. 79/2021 in O.S.No. 22 of 2014 on the file of the VII Addl. District Judge at Visakhapatnam, ii)and to grant such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No. 22 of 2014 on the file of the VII Addl. District Judge at Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the C.R.P., in the interest of justice and to pass A Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VHEMANTH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1.VVRAVI PRASAD The Court made the following: ORDER: \ The present revision is filed against the order dated 29.12.2021 in I.A.No.79 of 2021 in O.S.No.22 of 2014 on the file of the learned VII Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam. 2. There is no representation for the petitioner. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the lis between the parties has been amicably settled before the Lok Adalat. 3. 4. The submission is placed on record. 5. In view of the same, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the instant revision and accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. SDI- M.PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The VII Additional District Judge at Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 2. One CC to Sri V.Hemanth Kumar, Advocate {OPUC] % / 3. One CC to Sri V.V.Ravi Prasad, Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Amaravathi 5. Two CD Copies Pradesh at GPC TAC HIGH COURT DATED: 11/07/2025 ORDER CRP NO. 703 OF 2022 DISMISSING THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS