[2025:RJ-JP:11704] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3791/2025 Namonarayan S/o Shri Bhagwan Singh, R/o Village Sume, Police Station Batoda, Tehsil Bamanwas, Distt. Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3793/2025 Ayush Agarwal S/o Yashwant Agarwal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Infront Of Pyarelal Ki Bagichi, Shishya Colony, Ward No. 3, Gangapur City, Sawai Madhopur, At Present Near Shitla Mata Mandir, 30 Ft. Road, Near D.p. Police Station Sadar Gangapur City, Sawai Madhopur. (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3794/2025 Mohit Sharma S/o Ramesh Chand Sharma, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Kachhari Road, Khandelwal Photo Copy Ke Upper, Ward No 24, Gangapurcity, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan, At Present Tenant Plot No-A-49, Jagannath, Sheopur Road Sanganer, Jaipur Rajasthan. (Presently Accused Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravi Kant Sharma Mr. R.S. Shekhawat Mr. Rahul Agarwal For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Palash Srivastava HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 12/03/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested [2025:RJ-JP:11704] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3791/2025] in connection with FIR No.16/2023 registered at Police Station Cyber Police Station, Commissionerate, Jaipur for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 419, 384, 467, 468, 469 and 120B of IPC and Sections 66C, 66D and 67 Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and parties have resolved their dispute amicably. It is contended that trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, so also considering the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate, parties have resolved their dispute amicably and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. [2025:RJ-JP:11704] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3791/2025] 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – (1) Namonarayan S/o Shri Bhagwan Singh, (2) Ayush Agarwal S/o Yashwant Agarwal and (3) Mohit Sharma S/o Ramesh Chand Sharma, shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J pcg/989-991