- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:411 MFA No. 203675 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO.203675 OF 2024 (MV-I) BETWEEN: YALLAPPA @ YALAPPA S/O MALLIKARJUN BIRAJDAR, AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, RESIDENT OF KUDAL, POST BARUR, TALUK SOUTH SOLAPUR, DISTRICT SOLAPUR-413 008. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SANGANAGOUDA V. BIRADAR, ADVOCATE) AND: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, NEKRTC, VIJAYAPURA DIVISION, VIJAYAPURA-586 101. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MANJUNATH MALLAYYA SHETTY, ADVOCATE) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND ENHANCE THE COMPENSATION AS CLAIMED IN THE CLAIM PETITION BY MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 11.01.2023 PASSED BY THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MEMBER, MACT-V AT VIJAYAPURA IN MVC NO.740/2021. LUCYGRACE Digitally signed by LUCYGRACE Date: 2025.01.28 10:55:55 - 0800 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:411 MFA No. 203675 of 2024 THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI) Learned counsel appearing for the appellant files a memo stating that the present appeal is not pressed, since another appeal filed by the appellant in MFA No.201545/2024 is already disposed of. 2. Though this Court was inclined to impose cost for the inconvenience caused to the Court, accepting the submission of the learned counsel for the appellant that due to the oversight of the counsel, a double appeal has been filed, while frowning on such conduct and deprecating such method, the present appeal is dismissed. Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE LG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20