Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 117224 (ALL)

DEENA NATH PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. EDUCATION BASIC and 3 ORS.

WRIA/8383/2006 · 2025-05-12

Brij Raj Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:27772 Court No. - 28 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8383 of 2006 Petitioner :- Deena Nath Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Education Basic And 3 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Pandey,R.P.Singh,S.P.Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Cs.C.,Akhilesh Dubey,V.K. Bajpai,V.S.Tripathi Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J. 1. Case called out in revised list. 2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition. However, learned Standing Counsel is present. 3. The matter pertains to the year 2006 and since then it has remained pending. It appears that petitioner has lost his interest to pursue his case. Apart from it, by efflux of time, writ petition has become infructuous. 4. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) Order Date :- 12.5.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench