AMRESH KUMAR FORCE NO 041741084 v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. MINISTRY HOME AFFAIRS NEW DELHI AND ANOTHER
WRIA/557/2025 · 2025-01-22
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117195 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117195 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4016 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 557 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amresh Kumar Force No 041741084 Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Home Affairs New Delhi And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Suyesh Pradhan Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri Suyesh Pradhan, learned counsel for petitioner.
2. The petitioner has challenged the transfer order dated 22.01.2024 passed by the Director General, Central Reserved Police Force thereby transferring the petitioner from Group Centre, , CRPF Central, Amethi to 82 Bn. CRPF which is currently posted in Srinagar and subsequently after joining at Srinagar, the petitioner will have to take up duties in the 82 Bn/G which is a place 10 k.m. from Srinagar.
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that in pursuance of the said order, he has already joined and working in Srinagar but on account of the fact that the petitioner has slip disc with L4-5 and L5-S1 due to which certain restrictions has been imposed upon his movement and therefore he submits that he should be sent back to Group Centre at Amethi .
4. In this regard, it has been submitted that petitioner has given a representation dated 13.07.2024 to the respondent which is pending consideration and has not been decided so far.
5. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case respondent No. 2 is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 13.07.2024 (Annexure No. 15) in a time bound manner.
6. Learned Standing Counsel does not object if a direction is issued to respondent for expeditious disposal of the representation preferred by the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 13.07.2024 (Annexure No. 15) sympathetically, expeditiously,
say, within a period of six weeks from the date a copy of this
order is produced before him in accordance with law. (Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 22.1.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench