PADMA @ ROKKALA PADMA KUMARI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLP/2921/2025 · 2025-03-28
K Sreenivasa Reddy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11719 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11719 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAV . .
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH,\nd€ -Tasenf=i1+^+ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE \al/ : PRESENT: ut4Zof HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY cR[M[NAL PETITION NO: 2921 OF 2025 r, ¢¥tii"=+-i:-= Betwee n : * Padma @ Rokkala Padma Kumari, C/o. Pattern Venkata Ramana Rae, aged 41 years, R/o. 2-31-4, Ambedkar Street, New Colony, old Town, Tanuku Town and Mandal, West Godavari District. \~ ...Petitioner/Accused \ts# AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Protgfcutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. u.Respondent \.+..` Petition under Section 482 of BNSS (Corresponding Section 438 of Cr.P.C) is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in memorandum of grounds of criminal petition, the High Court may be ple=gsed to release the petitioner, on bail in the event of her Arrest ln Cr No.78 of 2025 on the file of Nunna PS, Vijayawada City, NTR District; \/ The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and memorandum of grounds of criminal petition and upon hearing the
arguments of sri Kale Vijay¥Raju, Advocate for the Petitioner and Public Prosecutor for the Respondent;
APHCO10136262025 E] lNTHEHIGHCOURTOFANDHRAPRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND T\^/ENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2921/2025 Betwee n : Padma @ Rokkala Padma Kumari ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State OfAndhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. KALE VIJAYA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: EiE iiE=
ORDER:- This Criminal Petition, under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short lthe BNSS') has been filed on behalf of the petitioner herein/accused No.5 to grant anticipatory bail in connection with crime No.78 of 2025 of Nunna Police Station, Vijayawada City, NTR District. 2. A case has been registered against the petitioner herein/accused No.5 and other accused for the offences Punishable under Section 143 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity lBNS') and Sections 81 and 87 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (for brevity lthe JJ Actl 2015,). 3. Brief facts of the case of prosecution are that, prior to 01.03.2025 at Door No.77-44/1-3, Fire Station road, Prakash Nagar, Payakapuram, vijayawada, police found three (o3) infant babies in possession of accused Nos.1 to 5; that the police apprehended the accused, took custody of the babies, seized the Cash and Cell Phones in the Presence Of mediators under the cover of a Mediators Report; that on 13.03.2025 accused Nos.10 and 16 surrendered before police and that they were alleged to have made confession about the commission of crime and also about the alleged involvement of petitioner herel'n/accused No.5. On the
3 strength of mediators report, a case in Crime No.78 of 2025 of Nunna Police Station was registered for the aforesaid offences and investigated into. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner herein/accused No.5 would contend that the` petitioner herein/accused No.5 was falsely roped into the crime-basing on the confession made by accused Nos.10 and 16. The petitioner herein/accused No.5 is running a marriage bureau an`d she is no way connected to the subject crime. 5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for State submits that the investigation is pending and some more witnesses need to be examined to come to a conclusion about the role played by the petitioner herein/accused No.5. 6. Heard both sides. 7. A perusal of material on record goes to show that the subject crime was registered alleging that the petitioner herein/ accused No.5 along with other accused was allegedly procuring the children and selling them by receiving payments, for the purpose of exploitation, in order to have control over them. 8. A perusal of contents of the FIR goes to show that a boy was handed over to one Nagamani in the presence of petitioner herein/accused No.5.
Px,-ma fac,-e there is no material to €
4 connect the petitioner herein/accused No.5 to the subject crime that she was benefited from any of the accused by doing the act of procuring the boy. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner herein/accused No.5, on certain conditions. 9. Accordingly, in the event of the arrest of petitioner herein/accused No.5 in the above crime, she shall be released on bail on her executing personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the arresting police officials. Further, the petitioner herein/accused No.5 shall appear before the Station House Officer, concerned once in a week ,I.e. on every saturday in between 10.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m. till filing of the charge sheet and further, the petitioner herein/accused No.5 shall make herself available for investigation as and when required and that she shall not cause any threat, inducement or promise to the prosecution witnesses. 10. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition, shall stand closed. / SD/u M.PRABHAKAFPu&. RAO ASSISTANT-R a± C\ i,s\TF&AR //TRUE COPY// I-* SECTION OFF§CER
To, •\, \,
1. The Station House Officer, Nunna Police Station, Vijayawada City, NTR Sai District. J~ \`,,. 2. One CC to Sri. Kale Vija::3;Raju, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two cos to Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP [OUT]
4. Onesparecopy ~ MM
HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED : 28/03/2025
ORDER CRLP.No.2921 of 2025 ALLOWED `'|,:` :®qny€G& fr Qdy¥Fb< A •#%_+. a 1 hPR \\\b RE_rdRERE