Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11716 (KAR)

SYED WALI AND ANR v. THE TAHSILDAR AND ANR

CCC/200165/2023 · 2025-04-22

K Natarajan, Vijaykumar A Patil

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2409-DB CCC No. 200165 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K NATARAJAN AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.200165 OF 2023 BETWEEN: 1. SYED WALI S/O HUSSAINSAB, AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, RESIDENT OF JEGARKAL VILLAGE, TQ. AND DIST. RAICHUR 2. SYED YOUSUF S/O HUSSAINSAB, AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, RESIDENT OF JEGARKAL VILLAGE, TQ. AND DIST. RAICHUR …COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI SHIVANAND PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SURESH SHARMA THE TAHSILDAR RAICHUR-584101 …ACCUSED 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M. S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-01 …PROFARMA PARTY (BY SRI MALLIKARJUN C. BASAREDDY, GOVT. ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2 – THROUGH VC) Digitally signed by NIJAMUDDIN JAMKHANDI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2409-DB CCC No. 200165 of 2023 THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, PRYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED HEREIN AND TO PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR HAVING DISOBEYED THE ORDER OF THE COURT DATED 05-06-2023 IN W.P.NO.200999/2023 (LR). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K NATARAJAN AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K NATARAJAN) This petition is filed by the petitioners alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 05.06.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.200999/2023 (LR). The operative portion of the order reads as under: “4. Whenever any representation is submitted, it is required for an authority to pass necessary orders on the same within a given time frame. The first representation having been submitted on 12.10.2022, more than reasonable time has been lapsed. Hence, respondent No.2 is directed to consider the representations at Annexures-C1 and C2 and pass necessary orders within four weeks from today strictly in accordance with law. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2409-DB CCC No. 200165 of 2023 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.” 2. The learned Government Advocate has filed an affidavit of one Sri Suresh Varma, Tahasildar Grade-I, Raichur district and submitted documents complying the order of the learned Single Judge of this Court. The counsel for the petitioner Sri Shivanand Patil also admits that the respondents have complied the order and issued the RTC. 3. The affidavit along with documents are placed on record. 4. In view of the compliance of the order of learned Single Judge, the petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the contempt petition is dropped. Sd/- (K NATARAJAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE SWK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7 CT:SI