Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11714 (CHH)

RANVIR SINGH RATRE v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/887/2025 · 2025-03-10

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:11682-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 887 of 2025 1. Ranvir Singh Ratre S/o Samaru Ram Ratre Aged About 44 Years R/o Village Navapara, Tarri Road, Thana Gobra Navapara, Tahsil Abhanpur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2. Praful Kumar Ratre S/o Samaru Ram Ratre Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Navapara, Tarri Road, Thana Gobra Navapara, Tahsil Abhanpur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House OfÏcer, Police Station Balco Nagar, Dist. Korba (C.G.) 2. Varsha Ratre W/o Ranvir Singh Ratre R/o Qr No. 810, B Type, Police Station, Balco Nagar, Sector-3, Dist. Korba (C.G.) ...Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. Prashan Dansena and Mr. Hari Agrawal, Advocates. For Respondent/State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.03.10 17:49:02 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 10 .03.2025 1. Heard Mr. Prashant Dansena and Mr. Hari Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for respondent No. 1/State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers: “1. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the FIR and final report lodged against the petitioners under Crime No. 379 of 2019 registered before P.S. - Gobra Navapara, District Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 498A read with Section 34 of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 2. Any other relief/reliefs which the Hon’ble Court deems fit along with the cost of the petition.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file afresh petition, as in the present petition prayers and pleadings are seems to be defective. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 3 5. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for subject to depositing a sum of Rs. 2,000/- as cost by the petitioners in the Registry of this Court within a period of one week from today and the said amount shall be transmitted to the Government Special School for Visual & Hearing Impaired, Bilaspur. 6. Certified copy of the FIR, charge-sheet and other documents may be returned back to the petitioners after retaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan