SANDEEP KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL.CHIEF SECY. RURAL DEVLP. and ORS.
WRIA/23854/2021 · 2025-05-30
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117135 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117135 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:33455 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 23854 of 2021 Petitioner :- Sandeep Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl.Chief Secy. Rural Devlp. And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Vivekanand Misra,Awadhesh Kumar Tiwari,Mohit Tiwari,Santosh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh,Virendra Kumar Shukla Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
"(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to consider the selection/ appointment of petitioner to the post of Panchayat Sahayak in Gram Panchayat-Shahpur, Block-Pratapur Kamaicha, District-Sultanpur in view of guidelines issued by the State Government, as contained in Annexure No.1 to the writ petition. (ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties No.3 to take decision upon the representation moved by the petitioner for selection/ appointment to the post of Panchayat Sahayak in Gram Panchayat-Shahpur, Block- Pratapur Kamaicha, District-Sultanpur in view of guidelines."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has preferred various representations to the authorities concerned, but no decision has been taken on the same till date. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority and direction may be issued him/her to consider and decide the said representation within a stipulated time. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection if direction is issued to the Competent Authority to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a stipulated time. 6.
In view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant writ petition is being disposed of finally giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3 i.e. the District Magistrate/ Ziladhikari, Sultanpur taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him annexing therewith copy of his earlier representation, if any, and the relevant documents in support of his claim within a period of fifteen days from today, and if any such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order, with expedition preferably within a period of two months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order along with representation and the decision thereof be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 7. In view of the aforesaid terms, the instant writ petition is
disposed of finally. . [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Suresh/ Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench