WAHID ALI AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. REVENUE SECY.LUCKNOW AND OTHERS
A227/205/2025 · 2025-01-21
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117121 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117121 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:3639 Court No. - 8 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 205 of 2025 Petitioner :- Wahid Ali And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Revenue Secy.Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Raman Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Notice on behalf of State respondent nos.1 and 2 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent no.3 is dispensed with.
3. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has approached this Court with a limited prayer that he had filed an appeal under Section 11(1) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, which is engaging the attention of respondent no.2.
4. It is further submitted that along with the appeal an application for interim relief was made, however, despite several dates being fixed, the said application has yet not been considered and in the aforesaid circumstances it is prayed that an expedite order be passed so that the application for interim relief, filed by the petitioner before the appellate court, may be taken up at an early date.
5. Having considered the aforesaid submissions, this Court is of the view that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by
directing the respondent no.2 to consider and decide the pending application for interim relief dated 29.08.2024 in pending Appeal No.449 of 2024, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, preferably on the next date fixed, and in case if the same is not possible, then within a period of three weeks thereafter.
6. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the court concerned shall decide the application, strictly in accordance with law.
7. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. (Jaspreet Singh, J.) Order Date :- 21.1.2025 Arnima Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench