Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 117119 (ALL)

SHUBHAM PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS SECY. SECONDARY EDUCATION AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/625/2025 · 2025-01-21

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:3888 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 625 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shubham Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Secondary Education And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he does not intend to press relief no.(i) and only confines his prayer for a direction being issued to respondent no.2 i.e. Director of Education (Secondary), Lucknow to decide the representation of the petitioner with regard to his grievances. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to prefer fresh representation within two weeks from today. In case such representation is preferred within stipulated time then the respondent no.2 shall proceed to decide the same in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order within a further period of four weeks from the date of preferring of the fresh representation along with certified copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 21.1.2025 S. Shivhare Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench