Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11711 (CHH)

ARCHANA SHUKLA v. SHRI PRADYOT BASAK

CONT/320/2025 · 2025-03-17

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:12542 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No. 320 of 2025 Archana Shukla W/o Shri Pushpendra Shukla Aged About 41 Years R/o House No. 4/2482, Near Water Tank, Jangde Colony, Ward No. 4, Gokul Nagar, P.S. Sakri, Bilaspur- 495001 (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus Shri Pradyot Basak Sr. Divisional Manager, Divisional Office-VI, 2-F, Everest House, 46/C, Chowringhee Road, Kolkata-700071 West Bengal. ---- Respondent (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ___________________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Pillai & Mr. Sunil Verma, Advocate ___________________________________________________________ Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 17/03/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent/contemnor has willfully disobeyed the Court’s order dated 13.03.2024 passed in WP(S) No.891/2014 (Annexure C/1). 2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the VASANT KUMAR Digitally signed by VASANT KUMAR Date: 2025.03.20 16:31:27 +0530 2 order passed by this Court. 3. Considering the facts of the case and submission made by the counsel for the petitioner. On perusal of the order dated 13.03.2024 passed in WP(S) No.891/2014, it reveals that time limit was not given to the respondent authority to comply with the said order, therefore, this contempt case is disposed of directing to the respondent authority to comply with the order dated 13.03.2024 passed in WP(S) No.891/2014 within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, in accordance with relevant rules and law. 4. Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Vasant