RAJ KUMARI DHANUK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. GOVT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/465/2025 · 2025-02-24
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117100 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117100 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:11615 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 465 of 2025 Petitioner :- Raj Kumari Dhanuk Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Govt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Balwant Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ankit Srivastava Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri Sudhir Kumar Pandey, holding brief of Sri Balwant Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ankit Srivastava, appearing on behalf of respondent no.2- State Bank of India.
2. Sri Ankit Srivastava, appearing on behalf of respondent no.2- State Bank of India has submitted that the pension payment
order has already been prepared in favour of the petitioner and a copy of the same has already been forwarded to the counsel for the petitioner. He submits that on preparation, the family pension admissible to the petitioner will be deposited in her account next month onwards.
3. Counsel for the petitioner has also perused the pension payment order and submits that considering the pension payment order as well as statement made by counsel for the State Bank of India, the grievance of the petitioner would be substantially redressed.
4. In light of the above, no further grievance of the petitioner subsists. Accordingly, the writ petition is consigned to record. In case, despite the order, there is difficulty in receiving the pension, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition. [Alok Mathur,J.]
Order Date :- 24.2.2025 KR Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench