Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1171 (UTT)

ISTIYAK AND ANR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/32/2025 · 2025-03-21

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.32 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Ms. Suraiya Naaz, Advocate, for the petitioners. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. Mr. Rakshit Srivastava, Advocate, for respondent no.3. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners made a statement at bar that petitioners have been granted anticipatory bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 11.03.2025, therefore, she does not want to press the present writ petition. 5. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed, in view of the statement made by counsel for the petitioners, as not pressed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 21.03.2025 SK