LATIFA MALIK v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (REVENUE) AND ORS
WP(C)/2858/2025 · 2025-11-18
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11706 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11706 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 99 SUPPLEMENTARY CAUSE LIST-I
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 2858/2025 CM(7549/2025) Latifa Malik. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. S.S. Rizvi, Advocate. Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Ors ...Respondent(s) Through:
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge.
ORDER 18.11.2025
01. The learned counsel for the petitioner when confronted with the maintainability of the instant writ petition, seeks withdrawal of the same with liberty to approach the competent revenue authority for the purpose of demarcation of the land. Statement of the learned counsel is taken on record.
02. In view of the above, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
SRINAGAR: 18.11.2025
“HAMID”