Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 117035 (ALL)

VIJAY PRATAP SINGH v. RAJIV KUMAR MISHRA AND 4 OTHERS

SPLA/11/2025 · 2025-01-15

Attau Rahman Masoodi, Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2381-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 11 of 2025 Appellant :- Vijay Pratap Singh Respondent :- Rajiv Kumar Mishra And 4 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Pawan Kumar Pandey,Sharad Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- Vijay Kumar Srivastava,C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Singh,Ran Vijay Singh Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. I.A. No. 1 of 2025 (Application for leave to appeal): 1. Heard Sri Sharad Pathak, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri V.K. Srivastava, learned counsel who has put in appearance on behalf of respondent no. 1 and perused the records. 2. Leave to appeal granted. Order on memo of special appeal: 3. Heard Sri Sharad Pathak, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri V.K. Srivastava, learned counsel who has put in appearance on behalf of respondent no. 1. 4. Sri Sharad Pathak, learned counsel for the appellant at the outset while making submissions has argued that in para 10 and 16 of the judgment impugned herein, the learned Single Judge has made certain observations which in any view of the matter shall prejudice the inquiry ordered to be held against the appellant. We make it clear that the inquiry which is ordered to be held against the appellant shall proceed on its own merits and the observations made by the writ court shall not prejudice the case of the appellant except on scrutiny of the facts in the inquiry proceeding. 5. The appeal stands disposed of. Order Date :- 15.1.2025 Pradeep/- Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench