BEENU SONKAR v. UOI THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM NEW DELHI AND 2 OTHERS
/384/2025 · 2025-01-24
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117024 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 117024 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4735-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 384 of 2025 Petitioner :- Beenu Sonkar Respondent :- Uoi Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Petroleum New Delhi And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Pushpila Bisht Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard Shri Ajay Pratap Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri Krishna Lal Yadav, Advocate who has filed memo of appearance on behalf of the opposite party no. 1. The petitioner was the only applicant for allotment of retail outlet dealerships by the opposite party Corporation. She was required to submit certain documents, for which she was granted time but she could not do so. Now, she seeks two days further time. This is not a matter where the High Court should interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner may pursue the matter with the opposite parties or seek such other remedies, as may be permissible in law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 24.1.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Manish Kumar, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench