Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11701 (RAJ)

BHARGAVA TRADING COMPANY v. SHRI PRAVEEN BHARGAV SON OF LATE SHRI VISHNU KUMAR BHARGAV

CW/3866/2025 · 2025-04-22

Vinod Kumar Bharwani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:17025] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3866/2025 Bhargava Trading Company, Through Partner Shri Chetan Bhargava Son Of Late Shri Vishnu Kumar Bhargava, Age 60 Years, Resident Of Raghu Kamal Niwas, Ist Floor, M.i. Road, Jaipur, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus Shri Praveen Bhargav Son Of Late Shri Vishnu Kumar Bhargav, Aged About 59 Years, Resident The Grand Geejgarh, B-708, Hawa Sadak, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Other Address - Praveen Enterprises Through Proprietor Praveen Bhargava Address - Near All Saints Church School, Opposite Ganpati Plaza, M.i. Road, Jaipur, Raj. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Maharshi, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Sharma, Advocate HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 22/04/2025 : Instant writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner against the impugned order dt.05.03.2025 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge No.2, Jaipur Metro-I, in Appeal No.02/2025, whereby the ld. Appellate Court, while quashing & setting aside the order dt.29.01.2025, directed the ld. Trial Court to pass an order upon the T.I. application, after filing reply to the T.I. application & considering documents & arguments of the Counsel for the parties without being influenced by the aforesaid order. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties that vide order dt.19.03.2025 the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, while staying the effect & operation of the order dt.05.03.2025 passed by ld. Appellate Court, directed the ld. Trial Court to decide the temporary injunction application expeditiously, in compliance of the order passed by the ld. Appellate Court. [2025:RJ-JP:17025] (2 of 2) [CW-3866/2025] The temporary injunction application is still pending. Now both the parties are agreed that a direction may be issued to the ld. Trial Court to decide the temporary injunction application within a period of one month. Heard. Perused. Looking to the facts & circumstances of case & considering the submissions made at bar, the ld. Trial Court is directed to decide the temporary injunction application within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Till then, the order dt.19.03.2025 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court shall remain in force. Let a copy of this order be sent to ld. Trial Court concerned. In view of above, the present petition stands disposed of. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J. ASHOK-saurabh