Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11694 (MAD)

W.T.Masilamani Mudaliar v. The Director of School

WP/11385/2015 · 2025-07-02

Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 11385 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-07-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WP No. 11385 of 2015 and W.M.P.No.1 of 2015 W.T.Masilamani Mudaliar Higher Secondary School, Rep. by its Secretary & Correspondent, Masilamani Nagar, Walajabad 631 005, Kancheepuram District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Director of School Education, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 006. 2.The Chief Educational Officer Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District. 3.The District Educational Officer, Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District. 4.R.Sandeep, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11385 of 2015 No.53, Congress House Street, Pudupettai Gudiyatham Taluk, Vellore District. Respondent(s) Prayer: This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records culminating in the Order dated 13.03.2015 of the second respondent made in Na.Ka.No.7333/B5/2013 and quash the same and consequently direct the second respondent to approve the appointment dated 28.04.2012 granted to the fourth respondent as a Physical Teacher. For Petitioner(s): Ms.M.Swetha For Mr.R.Gophinath For Respondents: Ms.Akila Rajendran Government Advocate for R1 to R3 ORDER Ms.M.Swetha, learned counsel representing Mr.R.Gophinath, learned counsel on record for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. She also further submitted that though she filed vakalat and the same was returned by the Registry, on the ground that 'no objection' is not obtained from the previous counsel. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11385 of 2015 2. As the previous counsel was designated as Senior counsel by this Court, the question of obtaining 'no objection' does not arise. 3. Registry is directed to accept the vakalat. The petitioner is at liberty to re-submit the vakalat. In case, if vakalat is filed, the Registry is directed to take it on file. 4. In the light of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 02-07-2025 jd Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11385 of 2015 To 1. The Director of School Education, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 006. 2.The Chief Educational Officer Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District. 3.The District Educational Officer, Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11385 of 2015 MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR J. jd WP No. 11385 of 2015 02-07-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis