APHC010136232019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 5965/2019 Between: 1. D KUMARESEN, S/O DORAISWAMY, AGE 37 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O D. NO 249, CHINNADAMAL CHERUVU POST, PERNAMBET TOWN, GUDIYATHAM TALUK, VELLORE DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU-635810. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. 3. TO THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAMANER, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, V. KOTA POLICE STATION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. 5. B RAVIPRAKASH REDDY, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER, R/O SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, V. KOTA POLICE STATION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V NITESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.5965 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 and 3 herein in not taking any action on the complaint given on dt.30-3-2019 by the petitioner herein which was also sent by registered post on 30-3-2019 against the respondent no. 5 who is acting under the capacity of 4th respondent as illegal, arbitrary unconstitutional and consequentially direct the official Respondents 2 and 3 herein to take appropriate action against the respondent No.5 respondent who is acting under the capacity of 4th respondent herein forthwith and grant such other relief and reliefs, and to pass…” 2. Learned counsel representing Sri V.Nitesh, learned Counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 06.10.2025 Pmk 4 02 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:5965 OF 2019 Date: 06.10.2025 Pmk