2025:HHC:13624 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.7854 of 2025 Decided on: 13.05.2025 Pankaj Spinners Pvt. Ltd. … Petitioner Versus Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority & others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner : Mr. Mohit Jaitak, Advocate (through V.C.), with Mr. Dheraj Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondent-State. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- “A That a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate direction may kindly be issued directing the Respondent No.1 to demolish the illegal construction undertaken by the Respondent No.3 over the land of the Petitioner as well as khasra No.1300 at Village Mandhala, Tehsil Baddi, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh.” B. that in the interregnum direct the Respondent to inspect the subject land file a status report before this Hon’ble Court. C. Any other and further order, as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner and against the respondent in the interest of justice. D. The Writ petition may kindly be allowed with costs” 2. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner for some 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:13624 time, as prayed for, this petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty that as far as the issue of encroachment upon the land of the petitioner and carrying out illegal consideration thereupon is concerned, the petitioner can approach the Civil Court, if not already approached and as far as the allegation of raising unauthorized over certain land owned by the private respondent is concerned, the petitioner may approach the appropriate statutory authority. It is clarified that this Court has not made any observation qua the allegations which have been raised in the petition by the petitioner against respondent No.3. 3. The petition stands disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge May 13, 2025 (Rishi)