AQIL AHMAD AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/312/2025 · 2025-01-16
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 116859 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 116859 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 312 of 2025 Applicant :- Aqil Ahmad And 6 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Pandey,Bharat Kumar Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed to set aside the entire criminal proceedings of Complaint Case No. 5487 of 2023 "Mohammad Ismail Versus Sahil and others" under sections-147, 323, 427 & 506 I.P.C. Police Station-Bazar Shukl, District- Amethi alongwith summoning
order dated 05.10.2024 under sections-147, 323, 427 & 506 I.P.C. so far relates to petitioner no.1 to 6 and under sections- 147 & 427 relates to petitioner no.7. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he does not want to press this application with liberty to move an application for discharge through counsel before the trial court and the same may be decided by the learned trial court in a time bound manner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed providing that in case, the petitioners Aqil Ahmad, Vakil, Shabnam Bano, Aishma Bano, Muskan Bano, Sabira Bano and Muskan move an appropriate application for discharge through counsel before the concerned Court below within a period of fifteen days from today, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months in accordance with law, by the concerned trial court.
Order Date :- 16.1.2025/R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench