Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 116854 (ALL)

HANSRAJ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WPIL/29/2025 · 2025-01-16

Pankaj Bhatia

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2795 Court No. - 7 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 29 of 2025 Petitioner :- Hansraj Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satyendra Nath Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and Sri Ashutosh Mishra who appears for the respondents no. 5 & 6. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer : "Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 2 & 3 to take proper action against the opposite party no. 4 to 6 thereby remove illegal encroachment made by the opposite party no.4 to 6 over the public utility land (Chakmarg, Naveenparti, & Raasta) bearing Gata No. 416, 417, 370, 408 in Village Hamjapurpathan pergana Aldemau Tehsil Kadipur District Sultanpur in the interest of justice." 3. The counsel for the respondents no. 5 & 6 produces a report of the Lekhpal which states that no constructions are standing on the offending property. The said report of the Lekhpal is taken on record. 4. In view of the said statement, no further directions are required. 5. In case the petitioner is still aggrieved of any offending construction, he would be at liberty to take recourse of para 460 of the U.P. Revenue Code Manual. 6. The writ petition stands disposed off. Order Date :- 16.1.2025 VNP/- Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench