SUJEET CHADHA ALIAS SUJEET SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPCRL/2189/2021 · 2025-05-21
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11682 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11682 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPCRL No.2189 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Sumit Bajaj, learned counsel for the petitioner (appeared through V.C.).
2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned DAG along with Mr. Vikas Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner made a statement at bar that after investigation, charge- sheet has been filed against the petitioner.
4. The said fact is not disputed by learned State Counsel.
5. In view of statement made by learned counsel for the parties, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition and the same has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
6. However, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the charge-sheet in appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
21.05.2025 AK