Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11682 (JHR)

SAMBHU RAWANI ALIAS SHAMBHU LAL RAWANI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3263/2025 · 2025-04-28

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:12627] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3263 of 2025 ------ Sambhu Rawani @ Shambhu Lal Rawani, aged about 37 years, son of Moti Lal Rawani, resident of Kabirdih, Belatand, P.O.- Brahmandiha, P.S.- Topchanchi, District- Dhanbad (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-28-04-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Topchanchi P.S. Case No.20 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 105 of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed culpable homicide not amounting to murder. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the only allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner took the deceased Mangal Das to the work at old Tehsil Employee Building and by fall of a dilapidated roof of building upon him, the deceased died immediately. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 28.02.2025 as mentioned in para-18 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-16 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Dhanbad in connection with Topchanchi P.S. Case No.20 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/