VIJAY KUMAR SAHU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. LKO. AND 7 OTHERS
WRIC/375/2025 · 2025-01-30
Brij Raj Singh, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 116817 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 116817 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:6355-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 375 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Sahu Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Urban Development Deptt. Lko. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pravin Kumar Verma,Vivek Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anil Kumar Tripathi Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Vakalatnama filed today by Sri Shyam Singh, Advocate on behalf of the opposite party no. 5- Nagar Palika Parishad is taken on record.
2. Heard.
3. The petitioner's grievance is that the private opposite parties are not allowing the petitioner to undertake construction on his land.
4. Sri Anil Kumar Tiwari, Advocate has filed impleadment application along with counter affidavit saying that his client is the owner of an adjacent plot of the petitioner's land and it is the petitioner, who is not allowing demarcation of the said plot. The allegation is that the petitioner has encroached the 'Rasta'.
5. Be that as it may, this is a dispute between private parties, the petitioner may avail remedies as may be prescribed in law whether under civil or criminal law.
6. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. [Brij Raj Singh, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 30.1.2025 Anuj Singh Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench