Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 116780 (ALL)

VINITA v. RAJESH CHAUDHARY, ACCOUNT OFFICER (PENSION), U.P. JAL NIGAM, LKO.

CAPL/107/2025 · 2025-03-12

Rajnish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 4 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 107 of 2025 Applicant :- Vinita Opposite Party :- Rajesh Chaudhary, Account Officer (Pension), U.P. Jal Nigam, Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Vishwanath Tiwari,Kaushal Tiwari Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. (I.A. No.1 of 2025) This is an application for recall of the order dated 27.02.2025 on the ground that the name of the learned counsel for the respondent was not printed in the cause list. It has further been submitted that the order passed by the writ court has been complied and the representation has been disposed of. Learned counsel for the applicant does not dispute the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the respondent. However, he submits that no reasons has been assigned while rejecting the representation. It can be considered in appropriate proceedings in case the order is challenged. In view of above, the order dated 27.02.2025 is recalled. In re: Contempt Application Learned counsel for the applicant submits that since the order passed by the writ court has been complied, therefore, he does not want to press the contempt application. In view of above, the contempt application is dismissed as not pressed. ...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 12.3.2025 Haseen U. Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench