HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10749 of 2013 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Case taken up on mention. 2. Heard Sri C.P. Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri R.S. Upadhyay, holding brief of Sri B.V. Nayak, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Sri A.K. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State respondents. 3. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred for quashing the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No. 3584 of 2012 pending before learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mahoba under sections 498-A, 323, 506 IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Kabrayee, District Mahoba. 4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicants and opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the same has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding the same is on record. It is also submitted that in view of the said compromise, proceedings of the aforesaid case be quashed against the applicants. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and learned A.G.A. for the State have no objection to the above submissions. 6. In view of the fact that the applicant and opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on record, keeping in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 OR Naushey Ali & Others Vs. State of U.P. & Another, 2025 INSC 182 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed in respect of the applicants. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : C.P. Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Braham Vishal Nayak, Govt. Advocate Rajesh Kumar And Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 7. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No. 3584 of 2012 pending before learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mahoba under sections 498-A, 323, 506 IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Kabrayee, District Mahoba. are hereby quashed. 8. Accordingly, the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands allowed. October 6, 2025 Madhurima A482 No. 10749 of 2013 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- MADHURIMA GARG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad