DILBAGH SINGH v. MUKESH KUMAR AHUJA, IAS AND OTHERS
COCP/4134/2025 · 2025-09-29
Pankaj Jain
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 116752 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 116752 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP-4134-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 108 COCP-4134-2025 Date of decision : 29.09.2025 Dilbagh Singh ...... Petitioner versus Mukesh Kumar Ahuja, IAS and others ...... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Gaurav Mohunta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Malhotra, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral)
1. On 02.09.2025, following order has been passed:-
“Respondent No.1 is present in person. Compliance report by way of Mukesh Kumar Ahuja, Chief Administrator, Haryana Agricultural Marketing Board i.e., respondent No.1 has been filed. The same is taken on record. Counsel for the petitioner has produced copy of the
order dated 29.08.2025 passed in CWP No.24910 of 2025. Apparently, order dated 29.08.2025 sets at naught the direction issued in CWP No.7661 of 2025 vide order dated
02.07.2025. Counsel for respondents to show that the order dated 02.07.2025 passed by Division Bench was brought to the notice of Writ Court which passed order dated 29.08.2025. Adjourned to 15.09.2025.”
2. Today, Mr. Parmar has brought to the notice of the Court that petitioner herein was a caveator in CWP No.24910 of 2025 which DINESH KUMAR was decided vide order dated 29.08.2025. Even in the caveat 2025.09.30 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
COCP-4134-2025 application, order dated 02.07.2025 (Annexure P-1) was referred to.
3. The aforesaid being matter of record, this Court finds that once order dated 02.07.2025 stands superseded by order dated 29.08.2025, that too when the order dated 02.09.2025 was in the knowledge of the Bench, no further order is required to be passed.
4. Consequently, the present contempt petition is disposed off.
(PANKAJ JAIN)
JUDGE 29.09.2025
Dinesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No DINESH KUMAR 2025.09.30 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document