Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11674 (UTT)

SATISH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/2194/2021 · 2025-06-02

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.2194 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. None appears for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA along with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Present writ petition has been filed by the informant for the following reliefs: “(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent nos.1 to 3 to produce the progress report of Case Crime No.381 of 2021, under Section 302 IPC, PS SIDCUL, District Haridwar before this Hon’ble Court. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no.1 & 2 to change the present investigating officer of Case Crime No.381 of 2021, under Section 302 IPC, PS SIDCUL, District Haridwar.” 4. Learned State Counsel supplied the instructions dated 03.12.2021 to this Court, which are taken on record. On instructions, it is submitted by learned State Counsel that after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed by the investigating agency against the respondent nos.4 & 6, while respondent nos.5, 7 & 8 have been exonerated. 5. In this view of the matter, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is hereby closed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 02.06.2025 AK