Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11673 (AP)

Gorle Banoji Rao, v. Prl.Secy., Home dept., State of A.P.,

WP/5946/2018 · 2025-06-25

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010135272018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5946/2018 Between: 1. GORLE BANOJI RAO,, S/O.GORLE MADHUSUDHAN RAO, AGEDA BOUT 36 YEARS, OCC. PRESIDENT PACS, R/O. SALURU TOWN, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PRL SECY HOME DEPT STATE OF A P, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT AT VIZIANAGARAM. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SALURU POLICE STATION, SALURU, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 4. FAKRUDDIN S I, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SALURU TOWN POLICE STATOIN, SALURU, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in not registering complaint dated 15.01.2018 given by the petitioner against the 4th respondent though the report discloses cognizable offence as illegal, arbitrary 2 HN,J W.P.NO.5946 OF 2018 and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to register the complaint dated 15.01.2018 submitted to the respondents 2 and 3 against the 4th respondent, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to register the complaint dated 15.01.2018 given by the petitioner against the 4th respondent in relevant provisions of Indian Penal code, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRAVAN KUMAR NAIDANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 HN,J W.P.NO.5946 OF 2018 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5946/2018 Order:- Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 26.06.2025 LSP 4 HN,J W.P.NO.5946 OF 2018 249 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5946/2018 26.06.2025 LSP