Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4185 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 456 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rahul Prajapati Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Civil Sectt. Lko And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ravi Prakash Yadav Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not intend to press on with the relief (i) so far as it raises a challenge to the orders dated 24.06.2024 and 25.06.2024, copies of which have been filed as Annexures 2 and 3 to the petition. 2. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed so far as it pertains to challenge raised to the orders dated 24.06.2024 and 25.06.2024. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri P.K. Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for respondents no.1 to 5, and Sri Ravi Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for respondent no.6. 4. Under challenge is the order dated 26.12.2024, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the petition, wherein disciplinary proceedings have been required to be initiated against the petitioner by the Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Ayodhya. 5. The sheet anchor of the challenge raised to the order dated 26.12.2024 is a complaint dated 14.05.2024, a copy of which is Annexure-9 to the petition, which is said to be an anonymous complaint and on the basis of which the order impugned dated 26.12.2024 has been issued. 6. Apart from the fact that the order impugned dated 26.12.2024 does not even refer to the complaint dated 14.05.2024 which is the sheet anchor of the petitioner, the other aspect is that this Court vide order dated 16.01.2025 had required learned counsel for respondent no.6 to seek instructions in the matter which instructions have been obtained by Sri Ravi Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for respondent no.6, from the Basic Shiksha Adhikari Ayodhya dated 20.01.2025 per which he states that the complaints against the petitioner have been received from Sri Vijay Krishnan, Anubhav Singh and Sri Akhilesh Singh which upon being verified have been found to be true and in consequence thereof, the order impugned dated 26.12.2024 has been passed pertaining to initiation of the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner. 7. Considering the aforesaid as well as prima facie serious allegations as have been levelled against the petitioner as emerge from perusal of the order dated 26.12.2024 no ground for interference is made out. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed leaving it open to the petitioner to participate in the disciplinary proceedings which have been initiated against him. Order Date :- 22.1.2025 A. Katiyar Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench