1 941-WP.9118-22.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 941 WRIT PETITION NO. 9118 OF 2022 VIJAYA SUBHASH PUSNAKE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Gawale Anand Datta. AGP for Respondent/s-State : Mr. S. R. Yadav-Lonikar. Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Pulkundwar S. B. Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Mr. Shelke Manoj Uttamrao. … CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, AND SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ. DATE : 13.02.2025 PER COURT :- 1. Heard the respective learned counsels. 2. The petitioner has impugned the selection of respondent No.4. However, learned counsel for respondent No.4 would point out that alternate efficacious remedy is available to the petitioner in view of the Government Resolution dated 13.08.2014. Learned counsel for the petitioner tried to convince the Court that letter dated 05.07.2021 is an appeal. However, that does not reflect the impugned order or the proposal dated 04.06.2021. The above mentioned Government 2025:BHC-AUG:4166-DB 2 941-WP.9118-22.odt Resolution provides for the remedy of complaint and appeal against such appointments. Hence, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail the remedy available in view of the above Government Resolution. 3. Leave granted as prayed. 4. Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. (SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) (S. G. MEHARE, J.) … vmk/-