MS BRAHMAPUTRA METALLICK LIMITED THROUGH ITS ONE OF THE DIRECTOR AARSH SAHU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
WPC/1718/2021 · 2025-08-07
Arun Kumar Rai, Sujit Narayan Prasad
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11669 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11669 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:22651-DB
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.1718 of 2021 ----- M/s Brahmaputra Metallic Limited, a Company incorporated under the Companies Act having its works at Village Kamta Block, Gola, P.O & P.S- Gola, Dist-Ramgarh, Jharkhand, through its one of the Director Aarsh Sahu, aged about 40 years, S/o- Shree Kumud Prasad Sahu, R/o- 80, Kali Mandir Road, Burdman Compound, Lalpur, P.O & P.S- Lalpur, Dist- Ranchi, Jharkand.
… … Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. The Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. & P.S. -Dhurwa, District - Ranchi.
3. The Additional Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, P.O.& P.S. Doranda, District - Ranchi.
4. The Director Mines, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District – Ranchi.
5. The Deputy Director Mines, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District - Ranchi.
6. The District Mining Officer, Ramgarh, P.O, P.S & Dist- Ramgarh, Jharkhand.
7. The Assistant Mining Officer, Ramgarh, P.O, P.S & Dist- Ramgarh, Jharkhand.
… … Respondents -------
CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI ------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Vishal Kumar, Advocate
: Mr. Dhananjay Kr. Pathak, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Shray Mishra, AC to AG ------
Order No. 05/Dated 7th August, 2025
1. Mr. Vishal Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, has submitted that this writ petition is not to be pressed since it has become infructuous and, as such, the defect as has been pointed out by the office may be ignored.
2025:JHHC:22651-DB
2
2. We have gone through the nature of defect and considering the same, the defect is ignored.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has been heard.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the relief sought for in the present writ petition has lost its force and, as such, prayer has been made to render the writ petition infructuous.
5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Arun Kumar Rai, J.) Birendra/