Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11666 (JHR)

SHATRUGHAN CHAURASIYA ALIAS SHATRUGHAN KUMAR CHAURASIYA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3707/2025 · 2025-06-10

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:14967 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3707 of 2025 ------ Shatrughan Chaurasiya @ Shatrughan Kumar Chaurasiya, aged about 27 years, Son of Ram Karesh Chaurasiya @ Ram Karesh Mahto, Resident of village-Lankiya, P.O.-Narsinghpur Pathra, P.S.- Chainpur, District-Palamau, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Santosh Kr. Tiwari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vijoy Kr. Sinha, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 10-06-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Garhwa P.S. Case No.451 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under section 310(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with co-accused persons committed dacoity and looted the trailer of the victim. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is next submitted that nothing has been recovered from his possession and without putting the petitioner on T.I. Parade, charge sheet has been submitted against him. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.7 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 16.12.2024, as has been mentioned in paragraph no.01 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the co- accused persons have already admitted to bail. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Garhwa, in connection with Garhwa P.S. Case No.451 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/