Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11666 (AP)

M. Mohan Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/7216/2025 · 2025-03-26

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010135012025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 7216/2025 Between: M. Mohan Reddy ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. O UDAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “...to issue an appropriate Writ order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 in not receiving the document i.e., Sale Deed dt 16.01.2025 presented by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of The Registration Act, 1908 consequently direct the 4th Respondent to receive and register the document presented by the petitioner...” 2 2. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court, without touching the merits of the case, to issue a direction to the respondents to receive and register the document(s) presented by the petitioner. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue readily agreed to receive and register the document presented by the petitioner, in accordance with law. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, respondents are directed to receive and process the sale deed/document submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law. In case the instrument presented cannot be registered, the Registrar shall pass reasoned order as mandated under Section 71 of the Registration Act, as it is an appealable under Section 72 of the Registration Act. 5. With the above direction, writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed. _____________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA 26.03.2025 LSP 3 156 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 7216/2025 26.03.2025 LSP