HILAL AHMAD BHAT v. OWAIS AHMAD AND ARN. (REVENUE DEPARTMENT) WP(C)/966/2020
CCP(S)/490/2022 · 2025-11-25
Rajesh Sekhri
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11664 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11664 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 50
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) 490/2022 c/w i)WP(C) 966/2020 HILAL AHMAD BHAT …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: Ms. Uzma Amin, Advocate. Vs.
OWAIS AHMAD AND ARN. ...Respondent(s) Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
O R D E R 25.11.2025 CCP(S) No.490/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the contempt petition. Statement is taken on record. In view of above, contempt proceedings are closed.
WP(C) No.966/2020 Response stands filed on behalf of respondent Nos. 3 and 4. List for consideration on 30.12.2025. Interim direction, if any, shall continue till next date.
(RAJESH SEKHRI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 25.11.2025 Ishaq